The
observation of numerous individual differences in the biology of humans
necessitates an understanding of one’s own personal biological makeup because
deviations from these healthy “baselines” can potentially serve as early
detection markers of preclinical disease and allow for implementation of
targeted preventive strategies. Fortunately, recent innovations in wearable
monitoring devices and big data analyses allow for long-term data collection
and analysis to occur. A recent study published in the journal Nature Medicine
tracked the health of more than 100 people at risk for diabetes for up to eight
years. Participants underwent extensive testing each quarter, including
clinical laboratory testing, exercise and physiological testing, microbial and
molecular assessments, genetic sequencing, cardiovascular imaging and wearable
sensor monitoring using smart watches or glucose monitors. The researchers discovered over 67 major
clinically-actionable health issues – ranging from metabolic disorders, cardiovascular
disease, cancer, blood disorders and infectious diseases largely because the
scientists observed changes from baseline measures. The researchers reported they were able to
catch a lot of things before patients were symptomatic and this detection
allowed for patients to either be followed more carefully or to receive a
medical intervention. These results lend support to the idea of shifting the
practice of medicine from treating people when they are ill to a focus on
keeping people healthy by predicting disease risk and catching disease before
it is symptomatic
Health trackers have greatly altered how we monitor health. I think one ethical component to think about may be access, or the lack thereof to the technology to monitor their health. There are individuals who cannot afford to have the tracker which prevents them from having the benefit of predicting disease risk on an individualized level. While this could be a problem it is not a reason to not utilize the individual health tracker if you can. I think it is just interesting to understand how individuals that do not have the means to obtain it could be left behind in this health movement. I also think that the fact that some individuals cannot afford the trackers, it can lead to under-coverage bias in the study.
ReplyDelete